LunaticThinker.me

I’ve spent enough hours untangling legacy code to see how quietly entropy spreads: a duplicated validation, a helper that knows too much, a 200‑line function nobody wants to touch. The principles below are habits that keep change local and predictable. Reach for one when a concrete symptom shows up—duplicate logic, volatile dependencies, unreadable flow—not for the comfort of ticking a box.

For each principle you get: intent, indicators, refactor moves, examples, and trade‑offs. Use what solves the pain in front of you; ignore the rest until it hurts.

So what are coding principles, exactly? In this article, I’m using the term to mean shared heuristics for writing and shaping code: compact rules of thumb that help multiple people on a team make compatible design decisions over time. They are not laws or style‑guide pedantry; they are reusable decision patterns that reduce surprise, keep behavior consistent, and make change cheaper. A good principle gives you a way to name a kind of problem (“this is a DRY violation”, “this is YAGNI”) and a default direction for fixing it.∂

Practice:

1. Implement for current, confirmed requirements.
2. Introduce pattern only after distinct variants appear.
3. Cull unused scaffolding periodically.

Clean code is the bedrock of sustainable software development. It is not an aesthetic preference or a luxury for “perfect” teams—it is the difference between a codebase that accelerates value delivery and one that silently taxes every future change.

Inspired by the principles popularized by Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob), clean code emphasizes clarity of intent, separation of concerns, simplicity over cleverness, and a relentless focus on reducing accidental complexity. When code is written cleanly, it becomes a living system that can evolve safely. When it isn’t, every change becomes a negotiation with risk.

For nearly a decade, I have honed my skills as both a frontend and backend developer. Over the past five years, my focus has primarily been on backend development, specializing exclusively in JavaScript.

“Hold on, isn’t JavaScript both a programming language and a standard? Actually, no. ECMAScript is the standard, and JavaScript is just an implementation of that standard.

Do I, as a programmer, need to concern myself with the distinction above? Perhaps I should. However, my intent isn’t to debate the nuances of the programming language or the standard that underpins this elegant and versatile language. I’m also not here to delve into the complexities and debates surrounding JavaScript Engines and the emerging concept of JavaScript Runtime Environments (admittedly, I haven’t found a definitive source that encapsulates what I’m about to discuss, but let’s dive in anyway, shall we?).